Betley, Balterley & Wrinehill Parish Council
Minutes of the Meeting held
on 31 January 2002
PRESENT Ian
M Ashbolt
(Chair)
Steven
K Ball
Rita
Chisnall
Ken
Eaton
Bob
E Lindblom
Anne
Mountford
John
Price
Roland
P Seymour
Frank
A Speed
Jennifer
J Walton
G
Roger Gleave (Clerk)
A
member of the public
APOLOGIES Ronald
C Howarth
Reg
E Jenks
27/02 The Council considered the following
planning applications from Crewe and Nantwich.
(a)
Telecommunications
Installation (GPDO determination) at Betley Ash Quarry, Den Lane, Betley.
(b)
15
metre Telecommunications Mast (GPDO determination) at Lower Den Farm, Den Lane,
Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9BX
RESOLVED that:
(a)
The Council could not support the mast at Betley Ash Quarry especially
as nearby residents did not wish to have a mast near them, but had no objection
to the mast at Lower Den Farm.
(b)
The Council wondered if it might be possible to have a single
installation at Lower Den Farm to accommodate both companies.
28/02 The Council discussed at length the
desirability of producing a Village Plan.
A clear distinction was drawn between a Village Design Statement and a
Village Plan. The latter would consider
question concerning the development of the whole community e.g. Future adequacy
of school provision; transport needs; level of economic activity; types of
housing desired. The Village Plan would
cover the whole parish and distinct recognition of the needs of Balterley and
Wrinehill would be required. It was
agreed that for the next meeting in the light of the this discussion members
should examine the paper prepared by Chris Cernes for the October meeting and
see how its principals could be applied to the production of a plan for the
Village.
29/02 The Chairman informed members of the
following matters of immediate interest.
(a)
The
meeting with Newcastle BC concerning the Model Code of Conduct for Councillors
had raised a number of matters that would require detailed further
clarification.
(b)
The
date of the Annual Parish Meeting was fixed for 17 April 2002.
(c)
There was discussion of the most suitable
location for a noticeboard in the centre of the village. Members were asked to examine the Village
Green for their preferred site.
(d)
The
movement of soil and sand to Laudy Croft had now been completed; but there was
further sand (about 250 tons) available that could be obtained. It was agreed to take up this option.
(e)
The
informal links via Prohelp (Wardell Armstrong) over the development of Laudy Croft
were to be severed. Ken Eaton had
volunteered to carry out any necessary professional guidance in the
future. He was warmly thanked for this
by members.
(f)
He read the response from Newcastle BC to his letter which had expressed
concern over planning notifications to the general public. The Chairman was
asked to pursue the matter further as the response was inadequate in the view
of members.